Nasal Bone 3 Dimentional Computer Tomography Guided Tailored Osteotomy of the Bony Deviated Nose / 대한이비인후과학회지

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Correction of deviated nose is considered one of the most difficult and serious surgical operations in rhinoplasty. The correction of bony deviation, in particular, requires osteotomy. Although there are individual differences in the shapes or features of bony deviations of each patient, the techniques of osteotomy are limited. Therefore, for proper correction of bony deviation, it is necessary to set up a precise pre-surgical plan. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We categorized 187 patients with bony deviated nose into 5 types based on the analysis of preoperative nasal bone 3D computer tomography, and studied surgical method for each type. RESULTS: Of 187 patients, 92 (49%) patients are categorized into type I, 62 (36%) patients into type II, 12 (6%) patients into type III, 2 (1%) patients into type IVa, 7 (4%) patients into type IVb and 7 (4%) patients into type V. Only did eight patients (5%) undergo revision surgery due to unsuccessful outcomes. Major complications like infection, abscess, arteriovenous fistula, epiphora, and saddle deformation did not occur at all. CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning under the analysis and categorization using 3D CT is considered helpful for the precise and individualized surgery in corrective rhinoplasty.

Risk Factors of Saddle Nose Deformity after Septoplasty / 대한이비인후과학회지

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgeons operate carefully to prevent nasal deformity during septoplasty, however, rarely unfavorable esthetic outcomes such as saddle nose deformity may occur. This study was designed to investigate patient factors associated with post-septoplasty saddle deformity. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Of 588 patients who underwent endonasal conservative septoplasty from Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2014, a total of 183 patients were enrolled in this study group after exclusion. Patients were divided into two groups: 12 patients who developed saddle deformity of nasal dorsum after septoplasty belonged to the 'deformity group', and the remaining 171 patients were enrolled in the 'non-deformity group'. We investigated preoperative external nose status, patterns of septal deformity, dorsal septal thickness, the angle of axial and coronal deviation of caudal sepum on CT scan. RESULTS: The postoperative saddle deformity was not found to correlate with the location of the most deviated septum and the thickness of dorsal septum (p>0.05). 50% of patients in the deformity group had saddle nose preoperatively, showing statistical differences between the two groups (p=0.000). 75% of patients in the deformity group had severe deviation at the most deviated site, also showing a significant difference compared with the non-deformity group (p=0.011). The axial and coronal deviation angle of caudal septum in the deformity group were significantly increased compared with the non-deformity group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The preoperative saddle nose, severity of deviation, and angle of axial and coronal deviation of caudal septum are all possible risk factors of postoperative saddle deformity. We recommend that the surgeon should check these factors before septoplasty to prevent postoperative saddle nose deformity.